A campaign rarely loses time in the writing. It loses it between people. In an email approval chain each handoff adds an idle period, and four approvers can turn a 2-day plan into a week without anyone doing anything wrong. The fix is to remove handoffs, not to ask people to answer faster.
TLDR: Trace one campaign and you will find four delays: waiting to be opened, feedback merging, version drift and the last-minute recheck. Replace the chain with one review link where approvers see the real post, and run reviewers in parallel when the stakes allow.
Mydrop data, September 2026: on posts that went through a client approval on Mydrop, the median time from submission to approval was 6 hours, and 66% were approved within 24 hours. Method in the Mydrop social media benchmarks.
A typical timeline, hour by hour
Here is a realistic five-post campaign with a three-person chain: account manager, brand lead, client.
| Step | Active work | Waiting |
|---|---|---|
| Drafts finished Monday 4 pm | 0 | |
| Email to account manager | Opened Tuesday 10 am (18 h) | |
| Account manager edits, forwards to brand lead | 1 h | Brand lead replies Wednesday 2 pm (27 h) |
| Merge comments, send to client | 1 h | Client replies Thursday 11 am (21 h) |
| Fix feedback, resend for final check | 2 h | Final "ok" Friday 9 am (22 h) |
Total hands-on time: about 4 hours. Total elapsed: 4 days and 5 hours. Roughly 88 of those hours were waiting. The numbers are illustrative, but the pattern matches what most agencies see: the clock runs on waiting.
Delay 1: the email nobody has opened yet
The first idle period is the longest because the email has no deadline and no priority. Fix it by sending the ask with a date and a link, not an attachment.
Delay 2: feedback that has to be merged by hand
When two reviewers answer in separate threads, someone must read both, decide which wins, and brief the designer. That is judgement work, and it adds a handoff each round. Put comments on the post itself so everyone sees the same thread.
Delay 3: version drift
"Final_v3_FINAL" is how the wrong creative gets published. When approvals live in email, the approved file and the scheduled file are not linked. Approve the post as it sits in the calendar, so the thing approved is the thing that publishes.
Delay 4: the recheck on the day
If the approval is a day old and the post has been edited since, people ask again. Lock the post after approval, or reopen the approval automatically on any edit.
Compress the chain: parallel, not serial
Not every approver needs to wait for the one before. Decide which checks depend on each other.
- Serial when a later reviewer needs the earlier one's edits: legal after copy.
- Parallel when they check different things: brand lead on tone, client on facts.
Mydrop's approval workflow lets you set the stages for a brand, and the client portal gives the client a no-login review of the post as it will appear. Comments and status sit in one place, which removes the merging step.
For a reference on how short a loop can be, in Mydrop's data on client approvals the median wait was 6 hours.
What to ask each approver to do
A short brief for reviewers removes most second rounds. Tell each one what they are checking and what they can ignore: the brand lead looks at tone and claims, the client looks at facts and names, legal looks at promises. When a reviewer comments outside their lane, the post bounces back for no reason.
Time your own chain this week
Pick your most recent campaign. Write the timestamp of each handoff and mark the waiting periods. Circle the biggest one and remove only that. A 5-minute audit walks through it. Then try the one-link review on the next campaign by creating a free workspace at Mydrop.
Google review
Trustpilot review
Product Hunt comment
