When feedback arrives by email, Slack, WhatsApp and a passing comment in the corridor, approvals stall because nobody can say which note is the final one. The creator spends a day rounding up comments, then finds that two of them contradict each other. The fix is boring and it works: one place for feedback, one person who merges it, one deadline.
TLDR: Name a single comment location per post, an owner who resolves conflicts, and a closing time. Anything sent elsewhere gets pasted into that place by the owner, once.
Mydrop data, September 2026: across posts that went through a client approval on Mydrop, the median time from submission to approval was 6 hours, and 66% were approved within 24 hours. Method in the Mydrop social media benchmarks.
What scattered feedback does to one post
Take a single LinkedIn post. The client replies on email asking for a shorter first line. Their marketing lead sends a WhatsApp voice note about the image. The founder says "can we make it punchier?" on a call. Your own manager comments in Slack.
Now the creator has four sources, no shared version, and at least one conflict. They will either guess, or go back and ask. Both cost a day.
This is why threads stall: the work is not the editing, it is the reconciling.
Choose the one place, then say it out loud
The location matters less than the commitment. Whether it is comments on the post itself or one dedicated thread per campaign, pick one and announce it:
- "Please put all feedback on the post itself."
- "Feedback sent by chat or email will be copied there by me, but it may be late."
The second sentence is the useful one. It tells reviewers that using the official place is faster for them too.
In Mydrop, comments live on the post alongside the approval status, so the team and the client see the same notes. Look at collaboration to see how comments and roles work together. The client can answer through the no-login portal without being added to your team chat.
Give one person the merge job
Even with one place, reviewers will disagree. Someone has to decide.
Assign a feedback owner per client or campaign. Their job:
- Read all comments after the deadline.
- Resolve conflicts, asking the senior reviewer only if two comments cannot both be true.
- Post one summary: "Changing the first line and the image. Not changing the CTA, because the founder asked to keep it."
- Hand the creator a single list.
Creators then edit once instead of four times. And reviewers see their note was either used or explicitly set aside, which stops the same comment coming back next week.
Cap reviewers and rounds
More reviewers do not mean better posts. They mean more rounds.
| Setting | Default |
|---|---|
| Reviewers per post | 2 (content, plus brand or legal if needed) |
| Rounds of feedback | 2, then a call |
| Deadline per round | 24 hours |
If a post needs a third round, stop typing and talk. Ten minutes on a call settles what ten messages cannot.
Handle the off-channel comment gracefully
You cannot stop people from sending a WhatsApp message. You can make the response routine:
- Reply "Got it, I have added this to the post."
- Paste the comment into the official place, with the sender's name.
- Move on.
Do not argue about the channel. Over a few weeks, most reviewers drift to the official place because it is where they see their comment acted on.
One more habit helps: close each round out loud. When the deadline passes, post "Feedback closed, edits going in now." Late comments then go into the next round instead of reopening this one. Reviewers learn quickly that the window is real, and creators stop editing a moving target.
Try it on one client for two weeks
Choose the client with the most channels. Set one place for comments, name the feedback owner, and cap rounds at two. After two weeks, compare the number of days from first draft to approved, and the number of times the creator asked "which version is current?"
If both fall, copy the setup to the next client. You can create a free Mydrop account and run the trial with comments and approvals in one view.





















Google review
Trustpilot review